LIFTING THE CURSE ON THE
SEVSO TREASURE
Part II
Mihály Nagy
O
ne could ask how such extraordinarily large family treasures could emerge
here during the Late Antiquity.
The western part of Hungary belonged to Pannonia province during Roman times,
with the Danube forming its borders in the north and the east. Rivers are excellent
borderlines, since they are visible for all, mostly impenetrable and quite easy to defend.
At the same time they offer a natural highway for the military as well as merchants.
Pannonia, lacking mines with precious metals or significant commercial centres,
had little economic value for the Romans, but strategically it was tremendously
important. During the past two millennia military strategists knew that anyone
who controlled the Rhine–Danube line, controlled Europe too. Mainland routes
from Italy to the eastern provinces led through the valleys of the Drave and the
Save in southern Pannonia. All these routes had to be safeguarded, so Augustus,
the first emperor decided to annex this land to the empire. From that time the
southern bank of the Danube like that of the Rhine were dotted with fortresses
stationed with several thousand troops. The army guaranteed the peace of the
empire, while the soldiers had their privilege, the right to elect the emperor.
Pannonia was however exposed to frequent attacks by various Germanic and Iranian
tribes living beyond the Danube. Occasionally even the emperor had to come here
in person to command manoeuvres, as did Marcus Aurelius, who finished his
famous Meditations during a campaign on the territory north of the Danube. An
army that successfully kept barbarians at bay gained greatly in importance as well
as self-confidence. Twelve years after the death of Emperor Marcus Aurelius that
army was strong enough to make their commander Septimius Severus, residing
in the north-east Pannonian fortress Carnuntum, emperor. A few decades later, a
new era began that would last half a century, an era when “soldier emperors” (or
“barracks emperors”) ruled.
Defeated Germanic tribes or groups fleeing from their neighbours began settling
in Pannonia as early as the first century AD, and continued to do so in following
LIF TING THE CUR SE ON THE SEVSO TR EASUR E
109
Sevso or hunting plate. Diameter: 70.5 cm, weight: 8,873 grams. All photos of the Seuso
treasure are published by Courtesy of Hungarian National Museum
centuries. These immigrants largely abandoned their old ways and became
Romanised, sometimes so successfully that they were able to enter the highest
offices. A certain Maximinus (we shall meet him and his son later), for example,
who was born in the city of Sopianae (today Pécs in southern Hungary), and who
descended from the Carpi (a tribe that lived at the Lower Danube and fought in
alliance with Goths or Vandals against Rome), settled down in Pannonia at the
end of the 3rd century AD. We could also mention Stilicho the Vandal, born in a
“royal” family along the Danube where his father served as a cavalry commander:
he ascended to the highest ranks and served as master of soldiers, to become
finally consul in the year 400 AD.
The Pannonian high society of the 4th century was rich and influential: they
typically had estates at the centre of which there was usually a luxurious villa
110
HU N G A RIA N REV IEW | Jan uary 2015
– remnants of which were excavated
throughout the province, mainly
around Lake Balaton and in southern
Hungary. As a result of the strong
influence of the Pannonian elite, this
province produced several emperors,
the courts of whom were filled with
relatives, companions, cronies and
countrymen. By the middle of the
4th century AD the fate of the
Roman Empire was in the hands of
Pannonians.
The villa of Sevso shown in cross-section
Besides emperors, we know other
famous Pannonians too, like Saint
Martin of Tours, born in the western Pannonian town Savaria, where his father
served as an officer in the Imperial Horse Guard; or Saint Jerome the scholar, who
became a monk in Trier during the reign of Valentinian, and later translated the
Bible into Latin.
The archaeological heritage of this period bears testimony to the richness of this
province: a silver treasure fits nicely into the picture, as it is perfectly illustrated
by an outstanding collection of silverware found two years ago southeast of Pécs
in Vinkovci (in modern-day Croatia), the ancient city of Cibalae, the hometown
of emperor Valentinian I. The collection contains more than 50 items with a total
weight exceeding 30 kilograms, and resembles in some of its characteristics the
Sevso Treasure.
***
The most important objects among the published part of the treasure are the
Sevso plate and the copper cauldron.
The gilt and niello-inlaid plate has a beaded rim, inside we can discern a building,
on both sides of which hunting scenes are depicted. Scholars suppose that the villa
of the owner of this plate is represented schematically here.
We find the owner’s name in a short verse, written in Latin around a central
medallion, reading: H(A)EC SEVSO TIBI DVRENT PER SAECVLA MVLTA
POSTERIS VT PROSINT VASCVLA DIGNA TVIS. This can be translated as
“Let these small vessels remain duly yours Sevso, and let your offspring make use
of them for centuries”.
LIF TING THE CUR SE ON THE SEVSO TR EASUR E
111
The plate is exceptionally large and heavy, weighing 8,873 grams. Pieces of
comparable weight are known from another treasure from the 4th century AD,
which was found in 1628 in Trier. This was as monumental as the Sevso Treasure,
weighing 114.5 kilograms. Unfortunately only a description of the treasure
survives since the Jesuits are known to have melted it down soon after its discovery.
The Trier Treasure contained round plates weighing 9,350, 10,760 and 11,230
grams. The next heaviest piece belongs again to the Sevso Treasure: the Achilles
plate, not yet acquired, weighs 11,786 grams. The heaviest plate found so far, the
missorium, a ceremonial dish made on the occasion of the tenth anniversary of the
reign of Emperor Theodosius I in 388 AD which is now in Madrid, weighs 15,350
grams. A list of silver objects arranged according to their weight shows that pieces
made earlier in the 4th century are smaller and lighter. Based on a comparison
Central medallion of the Sevso plate with a dedication verse around it
112
HU N G A RIA N REV IEW | Jan uary 2015
with other pieces these
observations suggest a
date of manufacturing for
the most characteristic
pieces of the Sevso
Treasure
somewhere
between the middle
and the end of the 4th
century AD.
A striking characteristic
of the Sevso plate is
its
individualisation:
the gift is donated to a The middle register of the central medallion on the Sevso
certain person, and the plate: banquet at Lake Pelso
hunters depicted on it
can be seen approaching
a particular house in a central position. Inside the medallion there are other
distinctive features: a horse pictured on the left side is named IN(n)OCENTIVS,
while the water surface in front of the banquet is that of Lake PELSO, the Roman
name for Lake Balaton.
The workmanship is also exceptionally elaborate: scientists agree that a vessel of
this quality must have been made in a leading workshop of the Roman Empire.
The plate is not a serial piece, its pictures are not mere genres, but depict events
that really happened or were expected to happen. To sum up, this unique plate
was made by the best craftsmen with knowledge of the state of the art in a central
workshop for a certain occasion for a certain person whose house and whose
favourite occupation – hunting for boars and stags on his favourite horse – are
depicted on its surface. In the case of such rare pieces, we can usually ascertain
the circumstances in which they were commissioned. Can we do so in the case of
the Sevso plate?
At a round table conference on the Sevso Treasure held in 1990 in the city of
Augst in Switzerland, Dr Endre Tóth, archaeologist of the Hungarian National
Museum, suggested that the scene in the central medallion of this plate is of
the marriage of Sevso and his bride while a short verse expresses good wishes on
their betrothal or marriage. Dr Dorothy Pikhaus from Brussels University has
drawn attention to the likelihood that the poet who wrote the distich or rhyming
couplet had Virgil’s Georgics in mind: “… Fourth-century aristocratic families
were very familiar with Virgil’s works and they were certainly able to see the
reference.”1 Such an interpretation is supported by the fact that the method used
LIF TING THE CUR SE ON THE SEVSO TR EASUR E
113
by the poet of the distich is related to the art of allusion, i.e. to the cento, (a poetical
work wholly composed of verses or passages taken from other authors), which was
well known in late Roman times. Moreover, the three round objects lying on the
ground around and in front of the table can be identified as marriage wreaths.
There are other allusions to Virgil: the banquet taking place under the awning
is that given by Dido, the story and the pictorial representation of which were
wellknown in late Antiquity.
A work by Decimus Magnus Ausonius, a poet who was ordered in 365 AD to
travel to the court of Valentinian I, where he became the teacher of Gratina,
the emperor’s son born from his wife Severa, helps explain the link between the
middle register of the central medallion and Virgil.
Ausonius himself, in the preface of cento nuptialis (“A nuptial cento”) describes the
circumstances of its origin.2 During one of the campaigns against the Alamanni
(at the earliest in 368 AD), the emperor, wanting to know which one of them
Imperial diadem-shaped handle of one of the situlae in the Sevso Treasure. The hinge
attache shows a youth wearing a torque
114
HU N G A RIA N REV IEW | Jan uary 2015
was the better poet, challenged Ausonius to
compete with him. No doubt, Ausonius was
the better poet but, as he writes, “I did not
wish to leave him nowhere, nor yet to be left
behind myself; since my foolish flattery was
bound to be patent to the eyes of other critics
as well, if I gave way, or my presumption, if I
rivalled and surpassed him. I undertook the
task, therefore with an air of reluctance…”
Sevso and his fiancée
The poetic contest took place within
prescribed limits with only a few friends of
the emperor permitted to be present. Ausonius could not write a completely new
cento, because he was bound by the length, the events and the characters in the
cento of the emperor, so the substantial contents of the latter must have been
mirrored, though dimly, in the cento of Ausonius.
Composed purely of citations from the works of Virgil, the poem describes a
marriage banquet held in the open air. Moreover, Ausonius uses the adjective
dignus to describe the wedding, the same adjective that can be found in the distich
of the Sevso plate. In the poem, guests recline on couches (lecti) while servants bring
goat-flesh (the medallion depicts a goat with bound feet as servants disembowel
boar and fallow-deer) and fish (the medallion depicts a servant holding a plate
which might very well carry fish). The plate also shows a young servant angling
at Lake Pelso and depicts a stag hunt while the poem makes reference to the flesh
of fallow-deer and stag.
The main difference between the scenes depicted on the medallion and in the first
part of Ausonius’s cento is that in the latter, bride and bridegroom are not present
at the open air banquet. Still there are other similarities between the medallion and
the cento nuptialis. The moment of the dextrarum iunctio, or betrothal is represented
on the medallion, while the silver plate mentioned among the wedding presents
could be a similar gift, like the Sevso plate itself.
If we compare the poem of Ausonius and the objects in the Sevso Treasure, we
find other similarities: the diadem of gems and gold in the poem can be compared
with the diadem-shaped handles; the four youths with golden torques on their
breasts in the poem to the four attendants shaped as young men wearing torques
(heavy neck ornaments) on the buckets of the Hippolytus set (another item of
the Sevso Treasure which has not yet been acquired). During the 4th century, the
torque was a characteristic feature of the dress of the imperial bodyguards, as it
can be observed on the missorium of Theodosius I.
LIF TING THE CUR SE ON THE SEVSO TR EASUR E
115
The good wishes for a long life and offspring expressed in Ausonius’s poem can be
compared to those of the distich on the Sevso plate. This bears some resemblance
to the poet’s occasional epigrams. It is notable that its author endeavours to form
rhymes at the ends of all half-lines but the result is scarcely a masterpiece; indeed
its poor quality strongly suggests that the author was not Ausonius. But who then
is the author? Could it have been Valentinian? We cannot prove this, but nor can
we rule it out. The verse shows some influence of Ausonius, who wrote most of his
epigrams during his sojourn to the imperial court. If we accept the hypothesis that
there is a link between the poem and the plate, we may date the plate’s making
to the three years from 365 to 368 AD.
Do we have any reason for thinking that Valentinian who was considered a severe,
sometimes cruel soldier by his contemporaries, was interested in poetry and the
arts? The answer is yes, since his biographers make specific mention of his interest
in literature, and record the fact that he designed military buildings, could paint and
form statues of wax or clay. The historian Ammianus Marcellinus, a contemporary
of Valentinian and a former member of the imperial household guards notes that:
“He loved neatness, and enjoyed banquets that were choice but not extravagant.”
The paragraphs above are intended to portray the intellectual and cultural context
of the age in which the scenes on the plate were conceived. From this it is apparent
that both the donor and the receiver lived in the same milieu and were keenly aware
of the literary and artistic traditions of their times. It is also evident that both the
commissioner and the recipient knew the importance of Pelso, Innocentius and
the chosen language of the
dedication and imagery.
Another thing seems clear:
both men had benefited
from Roman schooling,
and were familiar with
Pannonia.
A combination of the Greek letters X (chi) and P (rho),
monogram of Christ
116
HU N G A RIA N REV IEW | Jan uary 2015
It is significant that the name
of the horse In(n)ocentius is
inscribed in a label; similarly
we find a bronze roundel
in Trier, which shows a
horse name also inscribed
in a label. It seems that this
technique was used in the
workshops of that region.
The name In(n)ocentius
meaning “innocent” and given to the
horse probably because it was a fierce
one, provides an insight into the namegiving customs of the 4th century.
Ammianus, a contemporary source,
refers to the fact that Valentinian I had
two man-eating she-bears at his palace,
one of which he called Innocentia (the
feminine form of the name Innocentius).
Historical sources make no reference
to the name “Sevso”. Perhaps it is
not a formal name, but an informal
one used by relatives or friends. It
may belong to a class of well-known
Germanic personal names – so-called
erweiterte Kurzformen – in which the
original name is abbreviated to one
syllable, in this case SEV, augmented
with the diminutive suffix -SO.
Similar names are known from the
second half of the 4th century AD,
e.g. that of Gabso, a bodyguard,
serving in the imperial court in Trier. The four-legged silver stand (quadripus) from
To find a German in the imperial Polgárdi–Kőszárhegy
court should not come as a surprise:
during the course of the 4th century,
from the time of the reign of the sons of Constantine the Great on imperial
bodyguards were recruited regularly from among Germans.
In case of Gabso we may reconstruct the longer form of the name as Gabadus
(in Vandalian language meaning “comrade”), but there are no Germanic names
beginning with the syllable SEV. However, SEVSO could well have been the
nickname of a Roman with Germanic roots or a German in Roman service.
During the second half of the 4th century AD soldiers with foreign roots could
attain the highest offices, and could even become emperor, like Magnentius, a
former commander of the imperial guard in 350 AD, who according to tradition
was the son of a Briton father and a Frank mother. Most of these “masters of
soldiers” commanding troops subordinated directly to the imperial palace were
of Germanic origin. This is one reason for believing that Valentinian, who was
tall, blonde and blue-eyed, could have been of Germanic descent. Before he was
elected emperor, he was the commander of the second elite cavalry unit of the
LIF TING THE CUR SE ON THE SEVSO TR EASUR E
117
imperial guards (his relative from Pannonia Flavius Equitius commanded the
first), the members of which were recruited form Germanic tribes although many
Romans served with them.
When Valentinian was elected, according to Germanic custom, soldiers took him
on a raised shield to the city. We have no absolute proof of Valentinian’s Germanic
descent, but just after he became emperor, a senator whose native language was
Greek, but who also knew Latin, stated publicly that he was not familiar with the
language used at court. It is therefore evident that a third language was used by
Valentinian’s inner circle.
It is also clear that the couple who owned the Sevso Treasure was Christian: this is
apparent from the monogram of Christ placed centrally at the beginning of the verse
around the medallion. This helps us to date the object: it may have been used after 28
October 312, when Constantine the Great defeated Maxentius, but most probably it
was manufactured after the the reign of Julian the Apostate (361–363 AD).
So who was Sevso? Judging from the magnitude of the treasure which is almost
two times heavier than the whole Kaiseraugst Treasure, whose owner could have
been a magister militum (master of soldiers) in or around 351 AD, we must think
of a man at least of similar rank. Certainly, the Sevso Treasure can be compared
to the Esquiline Treasure made during the middle of the 4th century AD whose
owners – the Turcii – produced a consul and two prefects of the city of Rome.
How is it that Sevso was even at liberty to use a piece of imperial insignia – the
diadem – although not in its original function, on his head? The handles of the
two silver buckets are shaped like imperial diadems, and they are exactly like
those worn by Valentinian I, as can be seen on a statue head in Copenhagen
portraying the emperor, when he was between 40 and 50 years of age. The use,
even a symbolic one, of a piece of imperial insignia without the knowledge and
assent of the ruling emperor would have been unthinkable. In this connection it
should be remembered that when Iustus, the father of Valentinian’s second wife
Iustina, a governor, told friends of a dream in which he wore the imperial purple,
Emperor Constantine ordered his assassination. At the moment, the truth of the
matter is that we do not know exactly who Sevso was, although, as we have
shown, we may suppose that he belonged to the upper élite of the Roman society
during the second half of the 4th century.
At that time there was someone in the court who almost succeeded Valentinian
on the throne, and whom the emperor may have let use the symbols in the way
described above. His name was Severus, who held the office of the master of
the palace infantry troops (magister peditum) between 367 and 372 AD. Historical
118
HU N G A RIA N REV IEW | Jan uary 2015
sources mention Severus a few times, and from these we learn of his relationship
with Valentinian I. The historian Ammianus, reporting on the events of the
winter 366–367 AD informs us that the emperor fell seriously ill in Reims.
Ammianus states that “Meanwhile, when Valentinian was attacked by a severe
illness and was at the point of death, the Gauls who were at court in the emperor’s
service, at a secret conference demanded that Rusticus Julianus, then master of
the rolls, should be made emperor...”, but “against these Gauls some with higher
aims strove in the cause of Severus, then commander of the infantry, as a man
fitted for attaining that rank; and, although he was strict and feared, yet he was
more endurable and in every way preferred to the aforementioned aspirant”. Our
sources tell us that empress Severa, her mother and the strong Pannonian party in
the court decided who should be taken into account as successor.
Shortly after the day of the acclamation of Gratian, his eldest son, Valentinian
left for Trier, and was alarmed that “ ... the Picts, Attacotti and Scots... were
devastating Britain without resistance...” “...the emperor sent Severus, who at
that time was still commander of the household troops, to set right disasters”...
“but was recalled a little later...”.
At about this time Severus was replaced as commander. A few months later he
took part in the Alamannic campaign of Valentinian I, as one of the two masters
of soldiers. Ammianus briefly describes a military action led by Severus as a master
of infantry in 370 AD in Gaul against the Saxons. Two articles in the Codex
Theodosianus dated 23 December 371 AD, and 24 April 372 AD mention Severus
as a master of soldiers. We hear of Severus for the last time during a military action
of Valentinian I, which was to fulfil the emperor’s “first and principal aim”, the live
capture of Macrianus, king of the Germanic Alamanni. It was Severus’s troops who
crossed the Rhine and who almost took the king prisoner, but he managed to escape.
“Valentinian was robbed of this glory, not by his own fault or that of his generals...”
and, returning to Trier he foamed with rage like a lion. The emperor who was prone
to make rash decisions could have forced the retirement of Severus. The silence on
this issue of Ammianus who was clearly an admirer, suggests that Severus ceased
to play an important role in political life. In the circumstances, it may be safe to
conclude that he retired from public life and returned to his estate. Nor do sources
tell us much about his roots. Severus, who appears very early as an extraordinarily
influential man in Valentinian’s circle, belonged to the Pannonian faction, which
helped Valentinian to imperial power and like the emperor, was possibly born in
Pannonia. We know that at the time of Valentinian’s election three political factions
with different interests were present in the court. One of these factions consisted
of the followers of the late Constantine II led by the Alamann Agilo, the second
consisted of the followers of the late emperor Julian led by the Germanic Dagalaifus,
Victor the Sarmatian and Flavius Iovinus, while the third was that of the Pannonians
LIF TING THE CUR SE ON THE SEVSO TR EASUR E
119
Bust of a griffin on the quadripod
led by Falvius Equitius, his relative
Valentinian, and Leo, the keeper of
accounts at the office of Dagalaifus. All
these Pannonians later held important
offices. Masters of soldiers before
and after Severus held the office of
consulship, but for some reason, Severus
was not allowed to do so. Valentinian’s
first wife Severa, the mother of Gratian
also disappears from our sight after
the emperor divorced her around 370
AD and married Iustina, the young
widow of Magnentius. This marriage
was a reaffirmation of the relationship
of Valentinian to the former coalition
against Constans, one of the key players
of which was Gaiso, a high-ranked
officer bearing a Germanic name, but
it was important for him too, because
Iustina was a descendant of Constantine
the Great and he hoped that by this
marriage their offspring will maintain
the line of descent of Constantine.
As we have seen, high-ranking officials
of Germanic origin appear many times during the 4th century in the close
company of the emperor. We also know that various Germanic peoples such as
the Vandals settled in Pannonia under the reign of Constantine the Great around
335 AD, after they were catastrophically defeated by their ancient enemy, the
Goths at river Marisia (today Maros on the Great Hungarian Plain).
But let us relate all of this to the treasure. The chiselled geometric motifs, the
niello technique and the mythological scenes have some similarities to pieces
dated to the 4th century AD from Scotland to Moldova. But the griffin protomae
and the unique busts placed against a heavy row of pearls of the buckets display a
closer resemblance to a silver quadripod found in Polgárdi, Hungary. Its find site
is located just a few kilometres afar form a huge building complex thought to be
the residence of Sevso.
The feet of the quadripod are similar in shape and decoration to the handle of
the Hippolytus jug, another item from the Treasure which is yet to be added to
those now in Hungary. The handle of this jug is without parallel. The items stand
120
HU N G A RIA N REV IEW | Jan uary 2015
out because of their unique features
and unusual size: both the jug and the
quadripod are exceptionally large (the
latter is 113 cm tall), and the Polgárdi
quadripod is the only one made of
silver known from Antiquity (these
types of folding stands were regarded
as ensigns for high-ranked, senatorial
officials, such as the head-steward of
the imperial palace). The quadripod
and the Sevso Treasure consequently
complement one another perfectly.
The eighth piece acquired now by
the Government is a large copper
cauldron, in which a part of the
treasure had been concealed in
Antiquity, presumably because of
a sudden danger. The inner side of
the cauldron is covered with mineral
deposits, in which imprints of the
plates are visible. It is even possible
to reconstruct the order in which Male bust on the quadripod. The locks of hair
the dishes were placed: the Meleager are arranged into triangles like on the handle
plate was at the bottom, then the of the bucket
plate with geometric motifs and the
Achilles plates above it, and the Sevso
plate atop. This indicates that the plates and the cauldron belong together and
were buried at the same time. The shape of the cauldron is characteristic: its rim
is bent outwards, the neck is cylindrical with a slightly protruding shoulder and
a body slightly widening towards the bulging bottom. Similar forms in various
sizes occur only in the archaeological record for the territories near the limes (the
Roman frontier) in the Rhinish–Danubian provinces, and north of that in Free
Germany. A similar discovery was made at Igar, Fejér county in Hungary, where
a large cauldron containing hidden treasure was found.
The cauldron of the Sevso Treasure was manufactured with a special technique:
the upper part was made of two sheets, the shorter ends of which were bent over
each other, and fastened with a vertical row of rivets. The convex bottom part
was hammered out of a third sheet, and was fastened to the upper part by means
of a crenulated seam. This technique was used during the first five centuries
AD only in Pannonia, while two pieces – probably imports – are known from a
LIF TING THE CUR SE ON THE SEVSO TR EASUR E
121
site in Noricum near the Pannonian border. About thirty such pieces have been
excavated in Pannonia mainly around Lake Balaton and on the Danubian limes.
The horizontal crenulated seam combined with a vertical riveted seam appears
exclusively in finds around Lake Balaton, dating from the 4th century AD.
We know that the treasure was amassed during three decades in the middle of the
4th century AD and that it contained some earlier pieces decorated with geometric
motifs. The later, richly decorated pieces were not used for a long time, perhaps for
some years. They are unique and were made in the best workshop of the time for a
couple belonging to the uppermost stratum of the Roman society. The artefacts also
show traces of Germanic tradition, e.g. the name Sevso and the use of Germanictype buckets and large cauldrons. We also know that the owners had an estate in
Pannonia at Lake Pelso, where the treasure was concealed in a large cauldron due to
a sudden danger and was never retrieved until its recent discovery.
The concealment could have taken place in a period beginning at the end of June
374 AD when the Germanic Quadi living on the northern bank of the Danube
and the Sarmatians, a people of Iranian origin, invaded Pannonia. The hostilities
were triggered by the launching of a grand defence programme during which
the Romans built bridgeheads disguised as trading posts designed personally by
Valentinian along the Rhine and Danube rivers.
The direct cause of the invasion was the excesses committed by Marcellianus
Celestius, the military commander of the troops in the province of Valeria in the
Copper cauldron. Diameter: 83.0-83.5 cm, height: 32.5 cm
122
HU N G A RIA N REV IEW | Jan uary 2015
north-eastern part of greater Pannonia. Marcellianus was the son of a certain
Maximinus, a prominent, powerful and active member of the Pannonian faction,
born in Sopianae (now Pécs in Hungary) that had helped Valentinian to ascend
the throne. But such was the degree of devastation caused during the conflict that
Valentinian was forced to direct the military operations personally. Valentinian
died the following year at the camp of Brigetio, after which his old companion
Equitius helped persuade the troops to accept Valentinian’s younger son’s
accession to the throne. According to archaeological finds, the building that is
thought to have been the home of Sevso, was burned down during this period and
the quadripod was buried nearby.
At the moment, however, there are still more questions than firm answers. It
is known that there are still seven pieces that have not yet been acquired, and
according to some reports the collection may have included other items. We
are consequently able to put together some of the pieces of this intricate and
fascinating puzzle, but we cannot see the whole picture or lift the “curse” on the
Sevso Treasure while key pieces of the puzzle are held back.
1
2
Dorothy Pikhaus, Letter to the Editor. Minerva 1:7, 1990, p. 2.
Ausonius. Translated by Hugh G. Evelyn White. Cambridge – London, 1951, pp. 370–393.
LIF TING THE CUR SE ON THE SEVSO TR EASUR E
123